
Reader Shame: Award Season Edition
Ah, awards season for the sci-fi-o-sphere; it’s not a time of year I look forward to. Don’t get me wrong, I am thrilled and full of squee when the awards crunch is done and there are happy authors out there with trophies for their awesome books and short stories and everything in between. But the process of getting there isn’t my favorite as a reader.
(Or as a writer, for that matter, but that’s a whole other ball of disgusting ear wax.)
Why? I have a list for you:

- It’s a cruel reminder of just how few recently published books you’ve read. And here, “recently published” means “books published during the particular award’s nomination window.” You might think you’re feeling pretty good, chugging along through your backlog of the five brazillion awesome things all those excellent writers you love have been writing, bless their prolific little hearts, and you’ve even read some books your friends told you that you omg have to read right now about five years ago. And then it means nothing because all of those super awesome books are old news and ineligible and why aren’t you reading things that got published sometime this decade, dangit? It’s a level of reader shaming that’s only missing a sign and a cute but sarcastic photo on Twitter.
- If you actually have been keeping track of books published this year—good for you! and I hate you—you might end up having the opposite problem. You’ve read too many good books. The Hugo nomination ballot only has six spots per category. It’s probably inappropriate to send an edible arrangement with a tear-stained apology card to a writer you left off your ballot.